the politicians, their cops, their robbers, and the community: how the police drew fire and caused a multi-cultural implosion

this is what you get when the constabulary cross-over into the arts and media - a superintended sketch of death and destruction, hardly a picasso tho'...

...obviously rustled-up by someone a bit lower down the bill.

so what happened? did the victim shoot first? did he shoot second? did he shoot at all? did he panic and give police marksmen an excuse to execute him? did he need to give them an excuse? did the police make their own excuses (as per standard operational procedure)? we outsiders may never know, now that the independent police complaints commission are in charge of the show. however, i reckon it's fair to say that a young man black-enough to receive a free-and-obligatory state education in police-hatred was hunted-down and rapidly reformed by politically-correct gunmen with much bigger bang-bangs than the pop-stick they already knew he had in his possession. maybe friends of the authorities put the weapon into circulation with a complimentary tracker included? who knows? nevertheless, it's worth noting that, historically, only officials of white governments are permitted to shoot-first in self-defence - just as they have done in iraq, afghanistan, libya...

and so what happened next? well, that's a whole load simpler to explain:

this smacks of a racially-righteous revenge hit against left-wing-backed gangster-tappers suspected of getting the goods on the metropolitan's media-mafia front-man murdoch - a shell-shock-case of the authorities jumping the gun on the re-introduction of capital punishment. yet the trouble is...(and here i attempt to balance the book of badness, in the interests of social justice)...many of the inner-city gang-members, who will, from force-of-habit, guarantee the common-man a life of misery, anywhere the boys of the big-blue-babylon posse fail to deliver it first, are in fact themselves natural-born hangers-and-floggers. yes, it's no great secret: our beloved gangs are engaged in a continual turf-war with the copper-crew for civic customers (to subjugate) - their members budding enforcers of their own gang-culture and regulations, wannabee busies, if you like...and here, notwithstanding the rights-and-wrongs of this individual killing, is where the opinion of the ordinary citizen drifts unconsciously towards the territorial waters where one views such events as 'gangsters fighting gansters'...and not giving a hoot unless non-combatants, women, or children are caught in the cross-fire.

(i feel similarly about the deep electronic eavesdropping, computer-hacking and surveillance to which we are now accustomed to being subjected as a matter of course. the politicians use the police, the press, and underworld gangs to gain intelligence, but naturally these prolific press-gangs have a proclivity to spy-back on their political and business masters, and each other, for 'insurance purposes', in other words, blackmail opportunities, and to satisfy their craving for staving-off a collectively cool paranoia - i don't condone it, i wouldn't wish to encourage the practice of snooping any more than i'd want to encourage a person to smoke, it's emotionally unhealthy, but only for them...unless, that is, they target non-players, like myself, and casually try to intimidate with intimate insinuation...there again, i suppose, it's only detrimental if one is insufficiently strong, psychologically, to resist the temptation to partake in the hacking habit oneself. i guess it's the same all-over the country, we are bound to meet the politically-backed-up big-gang-leader who boldly slips us the sly suggestion of what he knows about our activities and hints at how he is empowered by his unassailable ideological beliefs to bully us, whilst, in the very same breath expounding upon the catalogue of his utterly altruistic actions and his consumately charitable character.)

anyway, the right-wing press (rather suspiciously) fell over themselves in their hasty glee to promulgate an eye-witness account of the victim being pinned to the ground and then shot in the head by law-officers - and the quote was subsequently picked-up and swiftly disseminated by left-wing activists and other agent-provocateurs in order to rack-up tensions. far from being unaware of the organized violence being planned against them, the policemen, having deliberately planted a couple of tactically positioned panda-cars nearby as inviting bait, proceeded to frustrate the peaceful protest-march with an arrogant lack of acknowledgement, and finally signalled authorization for the riot by gang-truncheoning a mouthy teenage girl, who chucked an unidentified flimsy object at them. next, enraged socialist-gangs went into overdrive and descended upon the billeaguered neighbourhood from all-around london, trashing, looting and torching private premises, commercial and domestic alike - beating-up anyone seen co-operating with the fire-fighters - and the officers of natural-law just stood back and let the community give itself a bloody-good hiding. as usual, we have been privileged to observe the spectacle of police and community movers-and-shakers working in perfect choreographed disharmony to produce a slickly staged scene of carnage. when will these guys ever realize that they have been systematically infiltrated and set-up? did they really think that this was the appropriate manner to mark the death of a respected 'community elder'. no wonder david lammy looked mortally embarrassed about his own christian-gangsters vandalizing his parliamentary consituency - divine retribution for him backing the bush and obama administrations' carpet-bombing of muslim communities in the middle east, methinks.

of course, i could be reading this all wrong, as there are claims by some rioters that they were incited to rebellion by a revolutionary polar bear who ate an eton schoolboy in retaliation for the recent massacre by a right-wing extremist of young socialists in oslo; the arctic mauling was a quite horrendous incident and i convey my sincerest condolences to the student's family - it is just so terribly tragic, if there were a god, he would surely have instead arranged for david cameron to have completed his expensive education thus.

clipped words

the following comment, by the voice of obama's black conscience (i like to get things right), was deleted from a post entitled news roundup on call me ishmael:

i am being undemocratically censored by a thick fascist thug on the work beckons thread of underdogs bite upwards, but i may as well repeat the comment here, since the subject matter is equally germaine to this site:

goddamnit, something seems to be niggling at my subconscious - and a gremlin has gotten in...try the remix:

my assiduous agents of free-speech-impediment have informed me that there is much talk on these comment-threads about my policy of prolonging, promoting, and perpetuating american and european allied wars against the white man's traditional target-markets (for bullets) - however, all is not as you guys may suspect, for the honest truth is this: i am subversively giving my brothers' former slave-masters enough racial-rope with which to lynch themselves, and fully expect that every white man will reap the reflux of his recidivism. really speaking, it's a win-win race-war for me - if the black man rises up, i will be hailed as his glorious saboteurial leader, if he falls, i am well-invested and will harvest the fruit of my multinational insurance policies, and, in any case, as things stand, the chinese are inscrutably impressed with the satisfactory progress i am making in delivering contractual continental suppression.

clipped words

the following comment, by the voice of obama's black conscience (i like to get things right), was deleted from a post entitled work beckons on underdogs bite upwards:

goddamnit, something seems to be niggling at my subconscious - and a gremlin has gotten in...try the remix:

my assiduous agents of free-speech-impediment have informed me that there is much talk on these comment-threads about my policy of prolonging, promoting, and perpetuating american and european allied wars against the white man's traditional target-markets (for bullets) - however, all is not as you guys may suspect, for the honest truth is this: i am subversively giving my brothers' former slave-masters enough racial-rope with which to lynch themselves, and fully expect that every white man will reap the reflux of his recidivism. really speaking, it's a win-win race-war for me - if the black man rises up, i will be hailed as his glorious saboteurial leader, if he falls, i am well-invested and will harvest the fruit of my multinational insurance policies, and, in any case, as things stand, the chinese are inscrutably impressed with the satisfactory progress i am making in delivering contractual continental suppression.

clipped words

the following comment, by not a hacker, was deleted from a post entitled work beckons on underdogs bite upwards:

00:35

yeah, i noticed some weird stuff happening too - a few weeks back, i was visiting your blog and it appeared that i was logged-in to your dashboard, i clicked on the editing symbol (out of curiosity), but was directed to the http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifblogger sign-in page. i reckon the people intercepting my internet-connection may also be hacking into your blog - either that, or you are hijacking my ip address and blogging through it. of course, this bloggehttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifr-trouble you're talking about could all be a rather badly disguised excuse for doing sod-all for a few weeks.

ps:

i presume you deleted-delayed-then-re-entered the 'wolf-aid revisited' comment because you sold the first version to staines or some other such cunt.


i think leg-iron has something to hide - and judging by the feed i am getting from the call me ishmael site it appears that he wants me to comment on it, presumably so that he can delete me there too (again). he seems to share character traits with captain ranty. piss off.

the commission for unconditioned equality

the following entry, by nelson madela, was not deleted from the comments section of a post entitled abandon law, all ye who enter here on the underdogs bite upwards blog (presumably because, as sir trevor phillips always said, the president just ain't black enough):

ahhh...yes...mr leg-iron...a most pertinent exposition...of an age-old problem...although...for my part...i have always tended to favour...the route of...truth...and reconciliation...by whatever means necessary...let me give you an example...

now you may be...aware...that i have recently been honoured...to receive a visit...from the good lady wife...of the president of the united states...who kindly...found a window...in her heavy shopping schedule...to pop 'round...to my humble abode...for a cup of tea...very nice too...may i say...however...it probably...has not escaped...your attention...that...the first lady...was not...accompanied...by her husband...

mmm...of course...i am sure...that there were...very pressing and...expedient...reasons...for the president's...inability...to make...the trip...but nevertheless...i wish him to know...that he should not...concern himself...unduly...for disappointing...no doubt...as his...enforced...absence...is...to us both...he may rest...absolutely...assured...that...i am not ready...to...peg-it...yet...and...i fully intend...to declare...a score...which prince philip...has...no damned chance...of passing...there-fore...i wait...in great expectation...on the...honour...of...the president's...attendance...and...being cognizant...nay...i should rather...say...sensitive...to the fact...that...he is not one...to miss...a photo-opportunity...i have...ready for him...here...behind the sofa...a traditional...donga...perhaps more familiar...to the president...as a...common...or garden...african...stick...which i'll use to beat his bony raaaassclath white american backside with if he doesn't quit flying his baaambaclath fighter-planes over mi yard t'raaaass

...excuse my...jamaican patois.

sir trevor for prime minister, methinks?

clipped words

the following entry, by me, was deleted from the comments section of an underdogs bite upwards blog-post, entitled through the looking glass - and my question therefore remains unanswered:

"dear mr leg-iron,

as local area convenor for the national association of firestokers and shitstirrers it has come to my attention, following complaints from a number of my members, that there has been an outbreak of comment-disappearing-and-then-later-inexplicably-reappearing-syndrome on google blogger blogs. we have received reports of this virus occurring on captain ranty, underdogs bite upwards, and even on my own blog spark up! in my own case, the deletion was completely unauthorized and was clearly effected by a hacker of some nature - indeed, the victim, micky molewarp, recently attempted to re-enter the afflicted comment after a time-span of several months, yet the comment was again summarily deleted by the stealth of an unseen, obsessive, and presumably ever watchful hand...yes, i appreciate that 'hands' cannot, strictly-speaking, be 'watchful', but that is neither here nor there. so, to return to the matter in hand...would you, in order to assist with our union's investigations, be in a position to divulge whether your own abducted comments were the result of:

a) an underdogs bite upwards editor with unresolved identity issues?

b) national government intelligence agency activity?

c) anonymous hackers?

d) national government intelligence agencies using the services of anonymous hackers?

or

e) any corrupt combination of the above? 

ps: although, no particular fan of the organ of liberal censorship otherwise known as the guardian, i have to hand it to their measly old moderators for publishing micky molewarp's exposé, in full, in a post under my comment is free account (now sadly suspended, indefinitely)."

god only knows how much this level of continuous surveillance must be costing the tax-payer.

clipped words

the british establishment are apparently very keen to cover up the horrific manner in which our government deliberately destroys the cultures of foreign nations in order to precipitate mass immigration, which in turn provides an ever-brimming pool of cheap labour - the following comment, by ghostofnursetwatitch, was deleted by the guardian from its discussion thread on an article entitled pm wins row with nick clegg over crackdown on muslim extremists:

"imagine a status quo where no ideologically motivated religious or political group (including imperialists like the conservatives, autocrats like the liberals, authoritarians like the labour party, fascists like gizmogizmo, and pompous prats like alpussdredger) could ever gain power and control, manipulate and exploit people...what a wonderful world that would be. it's not about changing our laws to accommodate other cultures (although ideally we would be grown-up enough live without laws, or at least have laws which do not infringe on citizens' personal freedoms), it's about not invading foreign lands and destroying other people's cultures - and so forcing them to immigrate here in order to make a living. if foreigners' homelands provided settled and stable environments in which to raise families, and they were not forced to enter this country for financial or security reasons, i am sure that immigration would be much reduced, and that the few who did choose to travel here would not feel that the united kingdom owed them any favours. we need a world under the reign of common-sense, really speaking - and of course, as a former nhs matron, i would be delighted to organize such libertarian utopia."

clipped words

our security services are certainly keen to cover-up their plot to overthrow libya and siphon-off african oil - the following comment, by nursetwatitch was deleted by the guardian from its discussion thread on an article entitled libya. the observer debate: is it right to be intervening in libya's struggle for freedom?:

"now, you might think that, as a true-blue babe of the women's institute, i would be backing prime minister davey dachshund's intervention in libya to the hilt of my sawn-off rolling-pin, but in fact i'm not - because i have detected, through the good orifices of the women's intelligence service, that he's fallen under the wicked unwomanitarian spell of president obama's shirty dirty conniving co...pardon, i mean...secretary, the arch-feminist, countess hillary clintwood.

i quite agree with mr dennis j kucinich, the dates of the planned military manoeuvres, code-named, operation southern mistral, are far too convenient to be true - and, suspiciously, have coincided exactly with the onset of the united nations' armed intervention. another 'strange coincidence' is that the mistral is a french wind which derives its name from the word meaning "masterly" in the languedoc dialect of the provençal language (although i tend to think of it as french guff, like all the pro-war propoganda we've been receiving on the radio), and it will come as no surprise, to more discerning readers, to learn that the mistral is a cold dry north-to-south-oriented draft which fans ferocious forest- and crop-fires - indeed its force can even be felt as far south as the north african coastline...reckon all this is far-fetched? well, listen-to-mummy: the mistral was also a french express-train which used to run on the paris-nice railroad...and now i believe you brain-stormed bbc scoffers are beginning to get my drift...

so put all of this together with the fact that the united states have urged the military of an effectively ungoverned egypt to supply the rebels with arms, the fact that the uprising happened right-on-time, the fact that potential candidates for the rebel leadership comprise westernized libyan dissidents, the fact that commentators on these pages have all but uncovered cia inflammation of the original unrest, the fact that the western coalition is weighing in heavily to make this fabricated french coup viable, the fact that the western nations have acted inconsistently by ignoring the plight of other democratic revolutions in the arab region, the fact that mi5 has hedged its bets by covertly grooming saif gaddafi to be the next (more liberal) libyan president, the fact that saif gaddafi is now attempting to cut a deal with the united nations, and the fact that colonel gaddafi is now being painted once more (after a brief kissy-kissy interlude with tony blair) as the terrorist-king...and any damn fool (even me) can clock that this is a cynically staged-war for the exclusive benefit of western oil-craving economies...perhaps western intelligences agencies even promised gadaffi that they would stir-up the latent rebellion specifically for him to quash...the west have definitely been playing all sides here...

...and, by the way, i see that my editor-in-chief, mr al pussdredger, has been pushing the loyalist line that the tokyo earthquake was, in reality, a pre-meditated strike by anti-western forces aligned with gaddafi, but this is totally untrue - the tragic honshu island atrocity (as the intelligence agency of every major power already knows) was a false-flag operation which was carried-out, with the full provocation of the cia, by supposedly anti-western elements completely unaligned with president gaddafi - and he will soon be smeared by a tumultuous tsunami of media-detonated terror-talk.
although i realize that the western alliance is now fighting to defend the lives of civilians which their own devious underhand actions have put in peril, although (when not disinfecting the dirty talk around here) i'm an unemployed medical professional, and

although i'm none too pleased about the exquisite collection of wives and 'nurses' which the colonel has amassed, i really cannot comtemplate support for this violent interference into private african affairs and politics - many lives are being cut short and devastated, and i just do not need work that badly. surely, to ensure altruism, there should be a clause in any united nations resolution which prevents combatant intervening nations from benefiting from future oil, or other, dealings - now that would sort the prospectors from the protectors, wouldn't it?"

clipped words

the following two comments (by alpussdredger) were deleted (by mi5) from the guardian article, libya resolution: un security council air strikes vote - as it happened:

"@alpussdredger
18 march 2011 ?:??am

the tokyo earthquake was an attack by elements aligned with gaddafi - either anti-western forces or criminals attempting to rig-up oil prices and manipulate stock prices by precipitating nuclear havoc and war. the japanese disaster was triggered by drilling into the subduction-zone, nuclear detonation, and the deliberate introduction of sea-water, which caused massive adiabatic decompression leading to rock-melt in the surrounding geological fault. haiti and christchurch could have been test runs, and the gulf of mexico oil-spill a similar act of sabotage. every capital city, international stock-market, and tectonically-exposed conurbation in the pro-american diaspora is now under threat at any time - and the 2012 london olympics is a certainty for a strike. western governments are aware of this situation, and know that they are being held to ransom, yet they still jump to intervene in the affairs of other nations despite further aggravating the risk of abysmal world-war - by continuing to exercize the policy of control, exploitation and oppression which has historically made the west the coalition of enemies we see arrayed against it today. i am no supporter of despots such as gaddafi, but occupation of libya by foreign forces will not resolve the problem of this country's pre-disposal to being ruled by suppression - the people must effect this change themselves if the solution is to be a lasting one leading to a strong independent african nation, otherwise libyans will simply fall prey to some other parasitic potentate, or the sort of carnivorous cartel under which we suffer in the western-bloc. in fact any oppressed state in the world, which wishes to escape the cruel and abusive clutch of the vice in which it is gripped, must beware that it does not rush and fall into the octopus arms of another superimposed-power on the rebound, in an unfree trade-off - the relationship will not work out, as the 'new love' will inevitably exploit the reverse-revenge race-hatred which has been brewed in the enslaved people's hearts by the original man-hater, and will continue to crush them. i wish freedom upon those libyan individuals who seek it, but i fear that no government or political party will ever provide it. in any case, regardless of external influence, gaddafi has fatally undermined himself by killing his own countrymen, and brings about his own self-destruction inexorably nearer with every life he wastes - the rot has set-in. i am loathe to provide the information which is contained in this comment-post, since i am sure that pernicious protection racketeers are seeking to set me up as conduit of terror. the souls devastated in the catastrophic attacks on the twin-towers, new york, and on honshu island, japan, may, to some surviving victims of generational genocide, seem numerically insignificant in comparison to the tens and hundreds of millions slaughtered in the name of greed and power by the destructive dynasties of western nations and their supporters - but malevolently motivated mass-murder is still, and always will be, wrong."


"@alpussdredger
18 march 2011 1:07am

and it is entirely possible, of course, that unscrupulous and wicked individuals within and affiliated to the international hierarchy (including libya) have stirred-up and staged this and other conflicts for personal profit and power."

this comment (on the same thread) has not as yet been deleted by mi5, but is meaningless without reference to the previous ones:

"@alpussdredger
18 march 2011 1:24am

...namely by manipulating the prices of oil, other commodities, and stocks. now we must all pray that this intervention is predominately humanitarian and does not become a commercial venture. one can only hope."

why i will not be attending notting hill carnival 2011

this year, i intend to avoid the annual notting hill carnival due to the presence of the following groups:

a) stupid white people: by which i mean the metropolitan police, who flock to this event each summer, irresistably attracted by the opportunity to provoke disturbances and engage in a spot of state-sponsored wog-bashing, on overtime.

b) stupid black people: by which i mean the community leaders who organize carnival and who always sanction a cop-shackled celebration of afro-caribbean culture, instead of standing on principle by cancelling carnival until such time as the police learn to attend the festivities as public servants, and not mob-handed serf-masters - the prevalence of this situation essentially being due to the fact that community leaders' favourite carnival sound is the ching-ca-ching-ca-ching of choked-up carnival cash-tills.

currently, carnival is no more than a cynically cordoned-off conflict-zone, meticulously organized by the london security authorities, in close collaboration with their corrupt counterparts in the local communities - their motto seems to be: why have a fiesta, when we can stage a fight?

clipped words

the folowing comment by jocelynjackesien was deleted from the comment is free thread on a guardian article, by jonathan dean entitled, radical feminism: what it is and why we're afraid of it:

"radical feminism? what's that when it's at home?

what i want to know is this: when barbie doll blofeld's finally been dropped down a swedish oubliette, who's gonna stroke his lab-rat-gerbil guido fawkes? who's gonna take over day-to-day management of his cult spy-network of hackers, blackmailers, fraudsters and snoops? and when they want to carry out surveillance and suppression of political dissenters...who are the labour party quasi-stasi gonna sub-contract their dirty operations to? in fact, who's gonna fill the information-black-hole which will be left gaping in state intelligence agencies, political parties, media organisations and prominent blogs around the world? who are cameron and murdoch gonna turn to now? who's gonna oversee global infiltration of all political and communications institutions?

my god, it makes me sick to see rusbridger acting all innocent on channel 4 - talking about people hacking into voicemails, when half the bloody country knows that there's industrial phone-tapping going on...and that personal mobile phones are being hacked into via their software and the microphones are being switched-on to turn them into 24-hour eavesdrops and tracking-devices. no mobile-broadband or phone network is secure these days - all the signals and lines are being intercepted and information being sold-on, it's bloody obvious. our own personal computers are being turned against us by commercial hackers and private investigators in the media and political spheres...micro-light digital surveillance equipment is being tossed around like confetti in public places and private premises and left to keep watch for the people who planted it. it's big business, by faceless crooks - and yet rusbridger pretends to know nothing about it...but i bet many of his interns and editorial staff know the score...not to mention his mates in the labour party. and i wonder why ed miliband isn't making a big deal out of the coulson affair?

hey guardian...how about an erotic exposé of the dirty voyeuristic secrets which are being concealed behind the un-netted curtains of the paranoid power-freaks of middle-class suburbia? you make me wanna puke rusbridger.

ask spark up - he's an independent politically unpaid un-aligned writer and he's really friggin' hacked-off by the continual intrusive pscho-ops being arrogantly perpetrated by party-political sychophants and parasites."

my own reply to the above comment was also deleted:

"@jocelynjackesien
9 february 2011 11:23pm

well thank you, ms jack esien - it's great that we can overlook petty philosophical differences on feminism and agree on something, for a change. god, don't you just want to turn off the telly when barbie doll blofeld and his oily lawyers open their whining mouths. i've had to resort to posting on this integrity free-dump because of fanatical labour-government-friendly deletions on places like guido fawkes, because of electorally convenient temporary erasures on old holborn (favouring prominent socialist members of parliament and a certain incumbent american president), and because of left-wing sensitive deletions on captain ranty which were closely followed by hacker deletions on my own blog (these occurring after i had the temerity to criticize assange's associates there). what a protection racket politics is, eh? i've even had my material purloined by a guido fawkes associate only to see it turn-up on a solo-comedian's bbc sketch show...uncredited..."

i can only guess that editors on the guardian have personal connections with the captain ranty blog, the old holborn blog, the guido fawkes blog, or with julian assange's anonymous hacker friends - and that they wish to cover-up the criminal hacking of comments from the spark up! blog. some moderators on the comment is free (guardian) site also clearly have connections with mainstream socialist political parties and could be receiving inducement in return for deleting dissenting views - there is also the possibility that the saltier deletions are being siphoned-off for use by commercial comedians. the upshot is that jocelynjackesien's account has been withdrawn by comment is free and my own sparkup account is now being pre-moderated and is effectively disabled. i fear that the guardian's disregard for freedom of expression will ultimately bring about their comment website's demise following an undignified trajectory which terminates in the aol recycle-bin.

curtailed words: suzanne moore forecloses guardian comment section in furious femino-fascist damage-limitation exercize

the following post, drafted in response to a guardian article by suzanne moore entitled it's time to get angry - all this polite and smiley feminism is getting us nowhere, was proscribed by the aforementioned publication's prepubescent editorial staff:

"within the isolated context of a sexual (and therefore interdependent) relationship, issues of sexism can be resolved if the footing of the relationship is positive - but if the balance of relations is bilaterally shipping negative-equity, the situation can only be resolved by one party admitting aggrievement and launching the lifeboat. 

feminism, as a movement, is purely a revengeful reaction to a socially-entrenched male sexist conspiracy (or so i'm led to understand), and, as such, has defeated itself from the outset by adopting identical macho gang-tactics - much in the same way as black-power activists have sought to combat white racism by organizing themselves in mimical accordance with the structurality of the white hegemony, instead of taking a more individualistic or culturally-integral approach. in the workplace, feminists waste their time attempting to counter the self-shackling sexist 'slavery' of employment by means of legal redress-mechanisms established (or should i say granted?) by males, when they could simply subvert institutional sexism by choosing self-employment - but, of course, the promotion of self-employment would not only emancipate women, and effectively do whingeing writers like ms moore out of a self-perpetuating and profitably parasitic job, but would have the somewhat unwelcome side-effect of liberating those awful men aswell...and we couldn't have that, now could we?

overreaction to injustice by discrimination against an entire social grouping is normal, although ultimately immature, human behaviour which is expediently employed as an emergency safety-measure - yet surely it is preferable to neutralize oppression by arranging one's life in such a manner as to avoid 'doing business' with identified oppressors, unless, of course, it's in one's own interests and on one's own terms.

as for the question of a curfew on bristol city, i regard this suggestion as highly illiberal and a rampantly retrogressive restriction of personal and sexual freedom - and not a sensible solution at all. clearly, since the female sex is naturally loaded with the immense responsibility of bearing children, the law of this country should be prejudicially amended in order that our females are also permitted to bear arms.

boom boom baby"

cash-strapped wikileaks needs dosh to cough-up docs

according to julian assange, wikileaks is leaking more money than confidential information - $618000 a week since they first started releasing sensitive united states diplomatic cables. apparently this is impeding the publication of further material - but not assange's memoirs.

why doesn't he nail the bunf to the fucking gatepost? i'm sure someone'll find it.

who's this cunt kidding?

the real whistleblower, bradley manning, is rotting in torture-town while assange preens himself for the paparazzi in the centrally-heated glare of a luxury norfolk mansion.

how much of wikileaks' windfall has gone to private manning's defence fund, i wonder...?

...and what the blazes were they doing with $618000 a week before the operation began?

sarkozy brands all true frogophobic englishmen as al qaeda

much as i deplore the recent abduction and murder of two french nationals in niger, it seems a bit rich of president nicolas sarkozy to automatically define the kidnappers as "al qaeda" - even wikipedia describes aqim (al-qaeda organization in the islamic maghreb), the regional rebel militia to which the french authorities claim the bandits may possibly have been affiliated, as: "commonly believed to be a false flag operation created by the algerian state intelligence agency" ie. either it has been termed al qaeda to gain the algerian government american support, or it has been radicalized by united states military intervention, such as the flintlock 2005 exercize, in a similar manner to which al-shabaab has been radicalized by fanatical-western intervention in somalia. so...given that aqim are known to be ideologically opposed to the slaughter of civilians, might it just be possible, mr sarkozy, that these unfortunate aid workers were killed by local nigerien gangsters, who not only resent the discriminatory treatment of muslims in mainland france, but also the pervasive persistence of french colonial rule in francophone africa over fifty years after the murky grey dawn of its supposed independence? after all, it's not only islamic extremists who hate you bunch of gallic garlic-munching baguette-crunching cheese-chomping boule-chucking horse-eating bastards, is it now?

busch banter

mandatory reading for all obama-sarkozy-cameron multi-fellatial cocksuckers:

gary k busch: the empire strikes back - france and the ivory coast