Sunday 7 August 2011

the politicians, their cops, their robbers, and the community: how the police drew fire and caused a multi-cultural implosion



this is what you get when the constabulary cross-over into the arts and media - a superintended sketch of death and destruction, hardly a picasso tho'...

...obviously rustled-up by someone a bit lower down the bill.

so what happened? did the victim shoot first? did he shoot second? did he shoot at all? did he panic and give police marksmen an excuse to execute him? did he need to give them an excuse? did the police make their own excuses (as per standard operational procedure)? we outsiders may never know, now that the independent police complaints commission are in charge of the show. however, i reckon it's fair to say that a young man black-enough to receive a free-and-obligatory state education in police-hatred was hunted-down and rapidly reformed by politically-correct gunmen with much bigger bang-bangs than the pop-stick they already knew he had in his possession. maybe friends of the authorities put the weapon into circulation with a complimentary tracker included? who knows? nevertheless, it's worth noting that, historically, only officials of white governments are permitted to shoot-first in self-defence - just as they have done in iraq, afghanistan, libya...

and so what happened next? well, that's a whole load simpler to explain:

this smacks of a racially-righteous revenge hit against left-wing-backed gangster-tappers suspected of getting the goods on the metropolitan's media-mafia front-man murdoch - a shell-shock-case of the authorities jumping the gun on the re-introduction of capital punishment. yet the trouble is...(and here i attempt to balance the book of badness, in the interests of social justice)...many of the inner-city gang-members, who will, from force-of-habit, guarantee the common-man a life of misery, anywhere the boys of the big-blue-babylon posse fail to deliver it first, are in fact themselves natural-born hangers-and-floggers. yes, it's no great secret: our beloved gangs are engaged in a continual turf-war with the copper-crew for civic customers (to subjugate) - their members budding enforcers of their own gang-culture and regulations, wannabee busies, if you like...and here, notwithstanding the rights-and-wrongs of this individual killing, is where the opinion of the ordinary citizen drifts unconsciously towards the territorial waters where one views such events as 'gangsters fighting gansters'...and not giving a hoot unless non-combatants, women, or children are caught in the cross-fire.

(i feel similarly about the deep electronic eavesdropping, computer-hacking and surveillance to which we are now accustomed to being subjected as a matter of course. the politicians use the police, the press, and underworld gangs to gain intelligence, but naturally these prolific press-gangs have a proclivity to spy-back on their political and business masters, and each other, for 'insurance purposes', in other words, blackmail opportunities, and to satisfy their craving for staving-off a collectively cool paranoia - i don't condone it, i wouldn't wish to encourage the practice of snooping any more than i'd want to encourage a person to smoke, it's emotionally unhealthy, but only for them...unless, that is, they target non-players, like myself, and casually try to intimidate with intimate insinuation...there again, i suppose, it's only detrimental if one is insufficiently strong, psychologically, to resist the temptation to partake in the hacking habit oneself. i guess it's the same all-over the country, we are bound to meet the politically-backed-up big-gang-leader who boldly slips us the sly suggestion of what he knows about our activities and hints at how he is empowered by his unassailable ideological beliefs to bully us, whilst, in the very same breath expounding upon the catalogue of his utterly altruistic actions and his consumately charitable character.)

anyway, the right-wing press (rather suspiciously) fell over themselves in their hasty glee to promulgate an eye-witness account of the victim being pinned to the ground and then shot in the head by law-officers - and the quote was subsequently picked-up and swiftly disseminated by left-wing activists and other agent-provocateurs in order to rack-up tensions. far from being unaware of the organized violence being planned against them, the policemen, having deliberately planted a couple of tactically positioned panda-cars nearby as inviting bait, proceeded to frustrate the peaceful protest-march with an arrogant lack of acknowledgement, and finally signalled authorization for the riot by gang-truncheoning a mouthy teenage girl, who chucked an unidentified flimsy object at them. next, enraged socialist-gangs went into overdrive and descended upon the billeaguered neighbourhood from all-around london, trashing, looting and torching private premises, commercial and domestic alike - beating-up anyone seen co-operating with the fire-fighters - and the officers of natural-law just stood back and let the community give itself a bloody-good hiding. as usual, we have been privileged to observe the spectacle of police and community movers-and-shakers working in perfect choreographed disharmony to produce a slickly staged scene of carnage. when will these guys ever realize that they have been systematically infiltrated and set-up? did they really think that this was the appropriate manner to mark the death of a respected 'community elder'. no wonder david lammy looked mortally embarrassed about his own christian-gangsters vandalizing his parliamentary consituency - divine retribution for him backing the bush and obama administrations' carpet-bombing of muslim communities in the middle east, methinks.

of course, i could be reading this all wrong, as there are claims by some rioters that they were incited to rebellion by a revolutionary polar bear who ate an eton schoolboy in retaliation for the recent massacre by a right-wing extremist of young socialists in oslo; the arctic mauling was a quite horrendous incident and i convey my sincerest condolences to the student's family - it is just so terribly tragic, if there were a god, he would surely have instead arranged for david cameron to have completed his expensive education thus.


47 comments:

max splifford said...

the story's now the robbery inspired riot, and no longer the anti-social ambush sprung by operation trident - brilliant public relations work by the police.

mental mimicry said...

the guardian are now reporting that initial forensic tests suggest that the bullet which struck the trident marksman was probably police ammunition - in more senses than one, no doubt...

shit, i should have known better than to believe the official propaganda...

so...we have the law-enforcers shooting themselves in the radio, closely followed by the community coming out in sympathy and shooting itself in the foot. brilliant, a savage satire on police tactics - without which, admittedly, most of us would not even have paid the original incident much attention. it would all have been a huge gamble, save for the fact that the troublicists trusted their sources and were sure of their side of the story.

spark up said...

whatever the unsubtle details, this shooting appears to have been a deliberately provocative act on the part of the metropolitan police - it was a pre-planned operation designed primarily to draw anti-government factions out onto the street, where they could be identified and detained for questioning.

the metropolitan police force must suspend all operation trident officers with immediate effect. in fact, in light of a blatant de facto extra-judicial execution, the only way to restore public confidence is for the entire police force to stand down - as they did in northern ireland.

03:40

mental mimicry, the looters and rioters are criminals, pure and simple - not publicists.

23:10

max splifford, the metropolitan police have not been clever, at all - they will come out of this débâcle looking very bad indeed.

one-share said...

i agree with a young man i saw interviewed on the television news, these young looters and rioters are, in reality, opportunists working under the 'anti-capitalist' and 'anarchist' mantle - but i feel sorry for them, many youths will receive heavy sentences for stealing goods which will net them little capital at the end of the day, yet the big opportunists who are masterminding these disturbances behind the scenes stand to gain many millions, even more maybe, from remote manipulation of the stock, housing, and insurance markets. the bear-market could be a multi-billion-dollar by-product for some 'anti-capitalists'.

diane demi-gob mp said...

16:21

no, i have to disagree with you there, one-share, the root of the riot-problem is an inadequate level of state-education for the under-privileged children of our inner-cities - especially in vital life-critical subject areas such as greek and political philosophy...if these poor ignorant youths had been properly taught, they would understand that the word 'anarchy' derives its meaning from the greek anarkhos, meaning 'without a ruler', and does not, as is the all-too-common misconception here in hackney, mean nicking trainers from the local branch of footlocker and having a right-good rumble with the feral filth (err...sorry, did i say 'feral' i meant to say 'federal', obviously). in fact, there are many academic interpretations of the word 'anarchy'...and, as an immediately-effective emergency measure, i firmly believe it essential to divert public money to fund crash community seminars in ethics and metaphysics, precisely in order that our dear disenfranchised teenage boys and girls may have the opportunity of debating ideological issues such as: "if anarchy means 'without rule', does it logically follow that, as an practising anarchist, one should not therefore rule oneself?" yes, indeed, setting our under-challenged and under-employed wayward youth this form of intellectually demanding question would have the dual-benefit of both keeping their furtively fertile minds fully occupied, and also of helping them to self-instruct on the daily discipline of differentiating between those awfully confusing concepts of 'right' and 'wrong'...hopefully, this would also have the added bonus of keeping the little rapping rogues off the streets for the duration, or until they've gained their doctorate, at least....and, of course, if, perchance, the darlings actually manage to come up with any definitive solutions to the moral problems which face us in today's capitalistic and consumerist world...they can always text me a comprehensive copy of their results...because, frankly, i'm fucked if i've got a clue, guy.

topsy-turville said...

17:42

immoral governments (of any persuasion) get the people they deserve, don't they diane, david, nick, ed etc etc.

the department of disenchantment (we are the problem) said...

due to the nature of the ignitial police-lynching-incident in tottenham, black and ethnic minorities were heavily represented in the maddened mob of multi-racial rioters, but because they used institutional racism as an excuse to loot, rob, and burn, we are now seeing the inevitable counter-craziness of white people using defence of private and commercial property as an excuse for retaliatory racism - and to mix-matters-up even more, as a consequenece of the serial shop-pillage, other ethnic minorities have become embittered towards afro-caribbeans aswell.

it's all really fucked-up.

the police, who triggered this whole racially-raw reaction, knew exactly what they were doing - they lit the blue touchpaper, stood-back, and let it rip. individual protection of one's livelihood and property is definitely the true key to checking the profligacy of an unruly youth and crime-culture, but since racism, class-discrimination, together with authoritarian exploitation and suppression (all served-up free-at-the-point-of delivery by the british establishment) has degraded the dysfunctional status quo unto disintegration, the resolution of this civil-sore is unlikely to be a particularly politically correct one - indeed, on the contrary, it must be domestic, as the police aren't going to stop premises from being destroyed, especially those belonging to classes and cultures which they are not paid to respect, and moreover, the police aren't paid to instil discipline in young people either, let alone discourage racism...quite the reverse, in fact. we have to address all these personal problems at home - for we can be absolutely sure that our repressive repacious war-obsessed government and its militarized mindset of dollar-dominated minions are never going to set a decent example.

of course, the logical extension of 'preserving one's own resources' culminates in a natural aversion to paying tax and receiving welfare benefits - which is fine, because it leaves the younger (and older) generations free (of excuses) to devote their creative energies to earning a living instead of extinguishing one. job done.

complacent codger said...

22:48

yes it was old-timers who put the youngsters up to this demolition job - but there were very few bold-timers who stood up to them.

daredevil dave cameron - club owner said...

22:57

so glad to see that ethnic minority community elders have fully integrated into established british culture by copying white community elders, such as myself, in putting their young men in the futile firing line of eternally rejuvenated race/revolutionary* war - what good sports they are too.

clearly i waited for the wave of riotous raves to receed before i returned to order thousands upon thousands of militant police party-organizers to take control of completely empty streets - which the communities had already tidied up nicely after the recent politically-correcting knees-ups, thank you. i believe i can confidently say that families have now cleared-up their own rubbish, tucked their djs into bed, and that my vision of a big-society is utterly and totally vindicated. hope you all had a great time and can't wait to see you all again at carnival - where i have pledged to provide, absolutely free-of-charge, party-sized hosepipes, to combat the effect of soaring-temperatures precipitated by global-warming scientists and their climate-change thingamijigs. safe man.

*delete as applicable

beach-head boris said...

16:32

yes prime minister, i think we've shown the world what a great bash we can organize if we put our narrow little racist minds to it...and weren't the goody-bags super - i bet the kids luvved 'em, what ho? of course, we're all very fortunate that this event took place under a conservative government, where the young people can benefit from properly supervized activities such as the 'doing the wonga-conga' and 'pass-the-pistol'. moreover, under a conservative government we, as citizens, can rest assured that the winners will all get the prizes they deserve - and doubtless, the most enterprizing of them will, generally-speaking, wake up with a severe hang-over, wearing brand new trainers in front of a 60-inch plasma tv-screen...and, may i say, wasn't it just great to see all sections of our rich and diverse multi-cultural community banding together and busily-working to achieve something truly lasting and worthwhile - absolutely marvellous, and, naturally, i need not mention that none of this would have been possible without the ideological imput and imagination of the metropolitan police force. wow, it was really worth ditching my luxury summer vacaction for...roll-on the extra east-london exercize 2012.

population pressurization by prestige said...

17:02

but boris, you miss the point - this kind of mass public disorder would never occur under a socialist government, because the looting-lefties rob the public-purse to buy-off the gangsters, meanwhile encouraging them to be the party's private intelligence agents, and so the incessant sound-level of criminality simply becomes a constant environmentally-polluting background noise.

the conservatives, on the other hand, give the police-force the edge by inducing them with special shoot-to-kill privileges in a deliberate attempt to antagonize the gangs and show them who's boss - but as we have witnessed, this arrogant class-suppressive policy always ends in a blow-out of safety-valve-riots.

you pays your taxes and you takes your choice...

david "the jackdaw" cameron said...

these immoral riots disgrace the british nation...i am sorry to say that i have seen video-footage of acts which have simply appalled and sickened me...one incident in particular shocked me to my very core-values...we've all seen the clip on tv, we all know to what i am referring...it's totally disgraceful to pretend to help people whilst robbing them...unless they're libyans, afghans, iraqis, or other dark african and asian fellows who happen to live in countries brimming-over with rich mineral resources, of course...that's fine...because, as the government of the united kingdom, we have been democratically and fairly elected to do things like this...it's got to be right - coz me 'n tony blairaid are in complete agreement on the matter. so there.

all roads lead to a bloody great tax-bill said...

20:53, 21:23

the members of our political parties are only interested in achieving power through social control and limitation of freedom, using as consciousness-choking smokescreens their respective ideological principles - to which they either fail to adhere, or which they fanatically impose upon the general public whilst omitting to observe them themselves.

out of place, out of face said...

16:32

it's criminal...and cameron, in common with all his pre-recessive prime-ministerial predecessors, is the biggest criminal of the dodgy double-dealing used car-lot some still glibly call great britain. as leader of this nation, cameron has chosen to take responsibility for the greater society in which we live, yet it seems he's not big enough to accept that this means he is actually the father of those rubble-rousing rioters out there running things on the street - instead, he and the malicious members of his parliament, duplicitiously disown the down-graded-class of the non-included, avoiding, lest they catch a superimposed selfish-snapshot of their own mugger-ambitions, the obscene opportunity of looking the affluently-afflicted benefit-addicted warfare-assisted direct in the eyeball, as many of their formerly unconsciously comfortable constituents were forced to, when falsely privileged to be fleeced and frisked over their undeserved deserts, offensively undisgusted at the daily dirge of decadently-priced à la carte dinners cooked-up in the hot-blood-oil and cheap-cold-sweat of the other undue world which makes the everlasting extravaganza emminently affordable. yes, we all want a bit of that...bumped-up grub, why not? but do we have to get so hooked on the unabated foreign fare that some cunt has to get bombed-out for it? and believe me, most of these mob-hearted steam 'n mash artists would feel too shy to patronize the exclusive educational exchange-rate of that classified establishment without blazing a baseball-bat, or swanking a premiership car-key, anyway...but we must ask ourselves why?...and whether they would even truly wish to keep such emotionally-estranged elitist company, where house-rules stipulate that you capitalize on your good-fortune and ruthlessly snub your roots? these pent-up punks professing their hatred of wealth...

(continued)

out of place, out of face (part two) said...

16:21

it's criminal...that mr cameron taxes business so heavily that these under-employed over-subsidized youths may never be incentivized to know how hard it is to run one...and how you have to devote every god-damned god-given waking-hour to screw-out a living from one. yep, the businessman is being throttled by taxes too...and he sure is pissed that his money's paying for popo the plod to pop-off and pepper the protoplasmic profiles of potential customers or traders, reared on the local manor's estate into a politically uncorrected unenlightened unprincipled underclass of battery-brothers, brought-up to breed misguided hate and misplaced envy...save silly old shopman's too fucking busy feeding the value-added government inspector to even register what a flagrant farce he's funding - but mind, coz he's well hardened enough to tough out this little crisis...and if he manages to bury his differences with the brotherhood of benefit bad-boys...put it like this...i wouldn't like to be in davey lockit's shoes when they communally knock on his whitehall front-door.

(continued)

out of place, out of face (part three) said...

21:23

now, the trouble's been confined to english cities (unless you count last month's ruckus in northern ireland...); libya and iran have been quick to support the sneaker-rebellion - whilst condemning the police suppression; the libyan government has called on cameron to resign; china's restrained itself to giving us one of those knowing looks...; the iranian government have even falsely echoed the preposterous claims by looters (bewilderingly broadcast by the bbc) that millions are starving in this capitalist country...red-rubbish, of course...at the moment...; the russian press has severely criticized cameron's hypocrisy in using violent suppression against rioters whilst at the same time claiming libya's undemocratic protest-quashing merits über-barbaric intervention through nato bombardment...

...and it all makes you wonder...who organized the british summer? after all, except for the initial shooting in tottenham, the uk government has been mighty reticent in deploying an armed response to the uprising...is cameron afraid that the riots were organized by external anti-british or anti-imperial forces who may have something bigger up their sleeve...? the police have certainly been loathe to escalate the conflict with potentially armed gangs...in fact, after the initial gang-style execution in tottenham, the police-force have exercized proportionate heavy-handedness (in so far as no rioters have been killed)...let's say aggressively tactful...but maybe not very tactical. it's as if each side is trying to goad the other into committing an atrocity...

well, i don't believe the british authorities have shot as many 'demonstrators' as did the libyans - but it sure as hell looked equally staged...and libya, iran, russia, and china may justly reserve the right to criticize our military intervention and interference in countries which we deem undemocratic - it's a warning really...for david cameron to pull troops out of afghanistan and libya...and to stop conspiring with the cia to meddle in and manipulate the internal affairs of states across africa, the middle east and asia. it's also a message for cameron to observe human rights domestically, in the uk - although i doubt whether these external critics genuinely care about this aspect too much...nor would they care if the united kingdom were overthrown and subjected to totalitarianism...

i'm no nationalist - nationalism may appear to afford freedom in the face of an invading power, but when that problem is, if ever, resolved, one is simply left with a state which disregards individual liberty in favour of the all-dominant sovereign mother-country...

...nevertheless, no, i don't believe david cameron should resign under threat of foreign pressure - whatever the rights and wrongs of our electoral system, he gained power by consent...and in any case, the left-wing opposition is equally repressive, ed miliband and company having barely criticized the libyan intervention, except on the grounds of cost, but never on a moral basis...and let's face it, the anti-capitalist sneaker-revolution hardly looks promising on the civil-rights front either, does it? no, cameron's got to get out of afghanistan and libya fast and address fiscal, judicial, civil, and political repression at home, here...before it all goes up in bloody smoke.

the armchair anarchist said...

03:54

no, cameron should resign, but dynamite the apparatus-of-state on the way out - to ensure there can be no successor.

03:51

i agree, these so-called anarchists and anti-capitalists are power-greedy fanatics ready to put one over on the rest of us common people - anyone who believes they despise wealth is a fool, their capitalizing actions do not match their words, for starters...they're grassroots activists at the moment, but like all pushy successful socialist politicians, they'll probably end-up extremely rich tyrants of the establishment (which they will dubiously and cynically dub 'new').

the great race-and-class swindle said...

03:51

and believe me, most of these mob-hearted steam 'n mash artists would feel too shy to patronize the exclusive educational exchange-rate of that classified establishment without blazing a baseball-bat, or swanking a premiership car-key, anyway...but we must ask ourselves why?

why shy? because these guys are conditioned by the state agencies of law, order, education and handouts, to believe that they are not worthy unless packing a seriously heavy bank-card, or born to be eton. it's all psychological of course - a massive thought-scam.

social segregation worker said...

03:54, 04:12

cameron and every member of parliament and politician down to the lousy local councillor along with every publicly-paid servant must resign and any forthcoming gangster that threatens to take their place and demands money for doing so by menaces must be allowed indefinite leave to enjoy the freedom of whitehall holiday-camp without recourse to the public purse.

personally, i think many africans, especially somalis, will be deeply offended by the looters' crass hunger-claims...they really blew it...but at least liberals, socialists, and conservatives are getting their heads together and wondering why their best customers are so inflamed - sadly, they're unlikely ever to pin the blame on themselves.

nanny in a state said...

as a demonstration against the police, these riots were very embarrassing for the government and police - but as a protest against corruption it was immoral, pointless, and therefore failed, because there is no guaranteed way of identifying which businesses are guilty of benefiting from illicit relations with politicians, and the wrong organisations were almost certainly targeted. only the recession and consequential lower tax-takes will eventually weed out those who are improperly subsidized by government handouts.

evicting tenants who have been involved in the riots will inevitably fail due to human rights legislation and simply lead to a massive waste of public money in the courts.

03:54

i'm glad that the bbc did report the lame excuses by rioters about starvation, because, truly, these youths were making a point - never have i seen a group of people so hungry and greedy for reponsibility, and indeed they now have their fill.

blue leftie said...

14:53

cameron cannot play at penally-motivated pick-and-choose policies in respect of rioter-evictions - the proposal that rioters should lose their council-flats undermines basic conservative values, because it implies that subsidized social-housing and welfare-benefits are something good which is being taken-away, when, in fact, every good conservative recognizes that benefits and the state-subsidized life is really a bad thing. cameron must stop pretending that evictions and benefit-withdrawals are a punishment, and have the nuts to admit that they are conservative policy. using misbehaviour as an excuse for scrapping the welfare-state by the back-door exhibits david cameron's cowardly nature at its ugliest - either we are all entitled to the safety-net of the welfare-state on principle, or it should be withdrawn wholesale, on principle. this drive to deprive is yet another strong indication that the riots were deliberately provoked by the police in order for the prime minister to slime-in policy surreptiously - and crack down on those whom he despises most.

cameron and his cabinet-colleagues know full-well that working-class youths deify their mum, and that, by evicting rioters' entire families, ministers will fuel the rebellion-against-repression still further. cameron is pursuing a policy of deliberate proletarian-provocation - and selective eviction can only be viewed as vindictive, because, as many commentators have already noted, private householders are not being targeted by these retaliatory orders, which therefore must be deemed dangerously discriminatory, and in breach of equal opportunities and fundamental human rights legislation.

rioting octopussy said...

now another oil-rig's gone up in smoke - it's time for our prime minister to admit that this country is under continuous attack...but he daren't, because public opinion in britain would then force him to withdraw troops from afghanistan and libya, and he would have to let down his bosom-buddies in the united states and the oil-conglomerates.

cut-price peace said...

15:50

i agree, after afghanistan and iraq, our intervention in libya represented the last straw for the eastern-backed sections of the international community. whilst our leaders are busy trying to undermine the governments of foreign countries, other unknown powers are successfully subverting our own state - this was inevitable. the eastern-backed left and western-backed right are spoiling for a totally unnecessary civil-war in the united kingdom - shame, when all we need to do is withdraw our forces from the sovereign nations of others and address pressing human-rights issues here at home.

unfortunately, the fanatics on britain's political left and right are mad for a fight and seeking every excuse to stoke up an internal conflict here which will see many ordinary folk suffer. what a disgrace that the super-selfish-spectrum comprised by our 600-odd members of parliament has allowed this situation to evolve and still does nothing to defuse the self-destructive device of democratic division

mix or match? said...

16:37

the right-wing will not back-down from neo-colonialist violent exploitative suppression of foreign states and continually persists in pursuing a path of policies which destroys domestic civil-liberties - whilst meantime the left-wing refuses to abandon its repressive tax-fuelled dream of a neo-communist liberal state totally unworkable in the face of an economic recession of which it has itself been the cause. obstinate domineering evil bastards the lot - all bent on engineering catastophic civil strife which is designed to consume the lives of ordinary common-sense people and subject them to whichever corrupt vision of pernicious power-greed comes out 'on top'.

supermop said...

united states cop, bill bratton, wants to make gang members fear the police - but has this reduced criminal activity in the united states, where more and more citizens are being thrown into jail? more american subjugation of britain, clearly.

daredevil dave cameron sticks his willy in the ants' nest said...

15:39

if memory serves me right, local authorities have the right under the council tenancy agreement to evict tenants who have been convicted of committing specified criminal acts - and, in the real world, we all have to be aware of this fact when relying upon government services to support us, as we put ourselves in an extremely problematic philosophical and political position (to put it mildly) if we seek to destroy the system which feeds us. however, as a universal government directive, this approach is not objective and smacks of discrimination, since the families of privately-housed, wealthier rioters will not suffer the same fate - ultimately imparting the message that it's not such a bad thing for hooray henries to smash up their local superstores. reason dictates that these evicted families will, in any event, have to be re-housed somewhere else, and it is the honest tax-payer who will have to foot the bill for the court costs, the appeal court costs, the bailiff costs, the police costs, the transfers costs etc...so it just strikes me as a highly antagonistic action towards an underclass which the established overlords of the manor have created through their own disregard and negligence.

micky minefield qc said...

20:17

given the prime minister's inceptual comments on evicting rioters, i would advise that the affected tenants appeal to the european court of human rights on the grounds of politically motivated discrimination.

sick-in-the-hq said...

03:51

the gangs are the state's babies, the gangs lean on the legislative wall of government prohibition as their main cash-prop - if the shady state preserves of drugs, guns, and secret intelligence were decriminalized, the gangs' primary profit-making activities would be undermined such that only common fraud, theft, blackmail and intimidation would remain available in their criminal portfolio, but characteristically the state insists on reserving for itself the right to deal in drugs, arms and intelligence in order to organize legalized and systematic fraud, theft, blackmail and intimidation for its own political purposes. gangs and political parties are essentially money-making operations which co-exist corruptly and covertly under the cover of a civilized society. the state depends upon organized crime to justify taxation and police suppression, whilst criminal organizations require prohibitative state legislation to facilitate their financial activities - the current troubles are simply an indication of a power-struggle between conveniently oppositional political pretenders, each unable to function without the other, each defined by the other, left meaningless without right, matter immaterial without anti-matter, since each ostensibly contrary component is a fundamentally an emotive element of the same bi-polar system of electoral extortion.

therefore, cameron's threats to throw criminals 'out of the system' are as much blunder-bluff as boris's brazen balliol bluster - because without criminality he has no system, and no fledgling felons to cultivate and concentrate in cruelty as consumable commodities for future foreign adventures in inter-continental wasting and looting. remember that hitler destroyed his own national socialist raison d'être by exterminating the very jewish people who were integral to his cannibalistic economy and hate-ideology, and in many ways our gangsters are similar, in that they, in company with the mr bigs of banking and other parasitic businesses, preside over one of the few growth non-industries returning a profit in this country, and the blunt brothers want to sit tight on all their dollars. our politicians, unless they malfunction and develop an extreme benevolence, never encourage citizens to live outwith the system, because the principle alone would end the established hegemonial harness. the riots are evidently a symptom of a tax crack-down against what cameron would describe as the lowest rung in our society, a crack-down which is not however replicated against the upper echelons of impropriety - the riots were clearly artificially manufactured to enhance the pay and position of the police-and-tax-state, and to make a quick killing for our inscrutable leader's invested mates and market-movers who manipulate the share prices of equities, housing, insurance and so forth. criminal - now we're all going to suffer from rationalization sickness.

self-understated code said...

00:38

yes, those who truly live outside 'the system' don't go around attracting unfavourable attention to themselves by murdering, looting, and laying waste to other people's livelihoods.

the socially-selective sword of calomoan said...

for low, consisteth it not in the cherished circumstance of a common civil commercial contract whence these chosen council tenants, by grace of their convictions, do now find themselves duly blessed with spiritual and lawful release...it doth counterwise constitute the satanic spectre of an evil criminal contract with the demon beelzebub himself, which maketh over them fearful landlords of both the celestial force of policemen and the high altar of the judiciary - verily an abominable and immoral condition, which by the divine power of ceremonial consequence doth guarantee that certain most worshipful companies do harbour cause to suffer under full-harsher service-specifications than do other civilized cunts. if it thus be deemed righteous so to release one of god's tenants from this civilly criminalizational clause in the lord's holy commandment, ye it must hereafter so be righteous to grant them all the good lord's licence for to venture forth, free of this deeply discriminating contract - tax-cuts all-round and the instant ideological abolition of the underclass, my children...hal-le-luuu-jaaah...hal-le-looo-jah...halle-le-luuu-jaaah...hal-le-looo-ooo-oo-jah.

hovelswop: a reality game-show guaranteed to give hours of raucous entertainment to the whole royal family said...

03:17

funny? i thought you were just shifting the tarred tenants from one council flat, in one particular area, to another council flat, in a different area - all minus the philosophy, but plus added social aggravation.

red edit said...

of course it's absolutely disgusting for the drummer, mr starkey, to claim that 'whites have become black'...

...although, obviously, we in the labour party have traditionally turned a blind-eye to british attempts at making blacks become white...however, that only occurs when we need to get a small minority of coloured chappies to nick valuable mineral resources from the rest of their countrymen - for example, in libya, ivory coast, nigeria, afghanistan, iraq...

sweeney plod said...

now...if all these bad-lads had created legitimate businesses and then refused to pay their taxes to the oppressive exploitative government, we could all have willingly backed them up when they eventually had to defend their property from the bailiffs and the forces of law and order.

the armchair anarchist said...

18:15

we could all have willingly backed them up

in principle, yes...but from the comfort of one's own living rooom, of course.

president of the greatest power in the world (deprived of its nonsense defense of self-defense) said...

we in the united states of america are not involved in the wild gaddafi chase (even tho' we really are) and, may i add, this national policy has in no way been influenced by the fact that we nobs in washington have just enjoyed the eternally enlightening experience of an 'earthquake' which was not actually an earthquake...but obviously i can't exactly admit that, because err...it would look a bit iffy for me to err...wage all-out war against err...africa...what with me being the err...first african-american president an 'all...and just because some gaddafi sympathizer let one off and made me miss my mother-fucking putt on the eleventh green of martha's vineyard golf-links, disastrously screwing-up my handicap.

i think we'll let the brits and the frogs handle the 4p-off-gas-glory (and decades of devastating guerilla-reprisals against their capitals and homelands) for dealing with this bloody great democratic balls-up in libertyland.

and shit, those chinese are goddamned clever cunts...got rid of the crafty colonel without even lifting a chop-stick in anger...neither a borrower or a lender be...unless you've got nukes and they don't. god save america - coz i sure ain't fuckin' gonna.

right and left - hand working within hand - fascist fist in communally knitted mitten said...

18:15

yes, the sharp young-guns followed the example of their elders in government and grabbed the opportunity of dubbing agency-inflamed greed a democratic uprising, sneaking a chance to try on capitalism for size, seizing the mad-moment to double-claim both membership and non-membership of the old-colonial club of thieves and murderers, in one bellowing breath - not a raging righteous wave against, but a cynical intellectually insured surge which washed up the beach flowing sameways as the age-old tide of common, conquering evil, just not quite as far, the little devils not being nearly adequately educated in avarice to be ravenous enough to render a riot into a revolution ripe for the reaping.

i blame it on the soft-logic of the socialist schoolhouse, an ideal nursery-bed for the hard-right hedge-row to root, ramble, abuse and farm freedom, and bleach the silly street-sod of all nutrient minerals.

didactic dave - the downing street dickhead said...

02:34

hello there, my good man, did you go to eton too, then? nailed it dead-on, you naughty fellow - of course, get 'them' to hate you on account of your skin-colour, class, or wallet, and you're already one step ahead to colonizing every commonplace culture on the globe, including the one growing in your own backyard. make them want what we have, but which neither they nor we really need, and merrily lead them by the nose, down the garden-path, generation after generation. it's all about power, the money's just fun for the sideshow. punchy and persuasive prep-school psychology - never fails. hip-hip-hoorah.

yob-miles said...

03:07

yeah...hatred of hatred...socialism misrules equally...progressive stuff man

beware people outside your fence who say the grass is greener said...

02:34

for a revolution to be successful, the leadership has to be greedier and blood-thirstier than the incumbent bad-guys - this is why many common uprisings, set-off by genuine hunger and unbearable suppression, only seek to replace the president and his government, not the entire establishment. however, in libya, the revolution, from its very inception, was led and organized by the cia and other western intelligence services, in conjunction with nato - hence the seemingly complete rout.

dr faustus credit facilities said...

02:34

lame left-wing logic and windows of opportunity - smashing.

13:59

if it's wrong to help an opposing faction within a foreign state overthrow the standing régime, it must be equally wrong for an opposition party to invite external powers to assist in undermining the government of one's own country...

...but when it comes to power, ethics go out the window.

no harmony is better than disharmony said...

the notting hill carnival organizers submit to an early police close-down of celebrations and music - then riots. same old story. why not hold the carnival without music (and trouble) as a protest against the suffocating police presence? maybe empty floats passing by the massed hordes of the police state would leave them standing like spare pricks. as people suggested last year, maybe confine the beat to simple drumming. these are ways of making a strong point which would be picked up by the world's press, but for the sake of commercialism and making a quick buck out of the tourists the carnival will continue to degrade itself with curtailment and truncation under the artistic direction of the metropolitan police, who know that the greater their presence, the greater the provocation to youths to riot. man, you'd think the community would rather cancel the carnival altogether than have the celebrations shackled-down under this oppressive degree of security? where's the pride thesedays?

empty orchestration said...

14:51

maybe empty floats passing by the massed hordes of the police state would leave them standing like spare pricks. as people suggested last year, maybe confine the beat to simple drumming.

no dancers, no music...just traditional drumming in the background? i reckon that would give the bouncers-in-blue the real willies.

Freebird Jussy said...

Why would anyone spam their own blog?

mr d i y doodlebugger said...

21:37

rationing in time of scarce supply? the person likes their own blog? why not? it's a free world - everybody does it, i hear.

a very interesting philosophical question, none-the-less - although obviously not one of any relevance to this particular blog, where we serve only the best organically-reared british beef, veg and the odd crunchy yorkshire pud. no nasty foreign american muck here dear.

Freebird Jussy said...

So many personalities, do you know which one is the real you?

personal views said...

10:55

just one personality - the one looking at the profile of your knickers.

i see you like getting down to the bare essentials too.

Freebird Jussy said...

You really should get out more into the real world. All you seem to do is try your best to get deleted and ignored by blogs. What's the point of that? The really cool bloggers don't even acknowledge your existence, they just delete and ignore you. Why do you bother?