Sunday 4 November 2012

obama: boss or floss?



let's not beat about the bush here...despite dreaming away four fluffy years in the complacent clouds of ideologically-insulated democratic fairyland, obama does not automatically deserve a second term in sleeping beauty's castle (bavaria, colorado), because, save for his innovation in using civilizing cruise-missiles to radically redesign the humble family abodes of brown folks across afghanistan, his vision in demolishing illiberal libya (together with the lives of a few tens of thousand black and arab africans) in order to make way for the extremist gangland-patchwork of a cia-inspired weaponry-wonderland, his dedication to the task of brutally eradicating a government with an un-american sounding name in somalia, his subversive approval for the toppling of an unaesthetically left-handed chocolate baron in the ivory coast, his bold promotion of black majority rule within the united states prison-system, his commitment to positive discrimination for african-americans wasting-away their lives on the waiting-list for a lethal-injection, and save for his abolition of due respect for archaic bureaucratic civil-rights legislation originally envisaged to prevent the hunting down and slaying of unarmed black youths, the first african-american president hasn't changed a darned-devil-detail of a thing for his fellow humankind, especially those in the poorer divisions. do i hear you cry "racist"? yes? well, err...not really, no i'm not...since i don't in fact believe that any american president has earned a second-helping, and, if the truth be told, none of these war-greedy dictators has ever earned the power which is laid-on with that particular presidency, at all...(except for poor old ronnie reagan, in his younger days a sincere intelligent man with immense political integrity, who obviously could not be held responsible for the war-crimes perpetrated by his subordinate gangsters on account of his grey marble being irretrievably diminished by old age.)

...and now, perversely, fully sated after four years of uninterrupted bloodlust, the vampires in the white house are making righteous overtures of peace toward the middle-east - however, reading such regular rounds of romney-bashing in publications such as the daily telegraph makes one peruse the possibility that president obama has long since secured the tel aviv contract on iran...there again, he might let the israelis go ahead and bust into tehran, but then inexplicably fail to back them up...

...okay, of course...in theory, i'd love the challenger, mister unmittigated, to be given a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to show how his free-market policies could ultimately shake-out the country's encrusted economic cobwebs, thus allowing his private corporate cowboys (instead of obama's public ones) to rob the electorate down to its very last dime...but alas, it must also be recognized that this single-minded single-celled ship's captain is in reality a crafty covert crypto-communist who desires nothing more than to skip the inauguration ball, jump straight into air-force one, and commence playing with his little red button. indeed, mr romney lives in the insidious hope of provoking a pre-emptive israeli attack on iran and subsequently precipitating a worldwide conflict which would see a half-hearted battle-weary north america and a less-than-half-hearted europe valiantly take on a hopping-mad heavily-armed russia, china, middle-east, south america and most of darkest disenchanted disenfranchized africa - with the final result most probably panning out accordingly: after a 20-year-long war, costing billions of lives, the united states would eventually be occupied by the victorious allied defenders of global-freedom and divided into four controlling sectors (the russian sector, the chinese sector, the iranian sector, and the zimbabwean sector) and the capital, washington dc itself, would be divided-up in similar fashion...great britain would suffer a nuclear attack before being surrendered unconditionally by her majesty the queen, although it would later be established that the decisive annihilation of london was actually a case of american friendly-fire...israel would get themselves mugged by their neighbours and demand rehousing from the chinese, to whom they had secretly switched sides before the war (which, you will remember, the israelis had initiated by attacking iran and triggering-off the whole shabang), the united nations would grant israel a charter to take up accommodation on the islands currently known as japan, the japanese would be removed to south korea, south korea would get taiwan, taiwan would...oh shit, i think you get the drift.

by-the-way, what's the betting on the american people voting for a suicide-dingbat who will merrily take most of them with him to republican hell? quite high, i'd imagine...?

...blast it, yeah...basically romney's a wrong-un, a complete nonny no-no - so i suppose we'll just have to return to offering mr obama constructive advice and making helpful yet sensitive criticisms...

to summarize his short but rank reign, the first african-american president has failed to close down guantanamo bay detention centre, but otherwise done sweet fanny adams and even she's getting brassed-off with the lack of material change - once you've seen the contents of one grey suit you've seen them all, apparently. obama claims that muslim people have suffered intolerably at the hands of terrorists, yet conveniently omits to mention that the overwhelming majority of attacks have been clumsily orchestrated by the united states army; obama claims that he stands for freedom of speech, yet, for example, has done nothing, here in britain, to quell the suppressive tactics employed by his henchmen and supporters against those who wish to question his distressingly scarred record on human rights; persistent drone flights over afghanistan and pakistan and their accompanying lightening-strike assassinations are inducing deep psychoses amongst local inhabitants on the ground; obama's presidency has given rise to rebellion and riot throughout the middle east, north africa and even here in little old england - his leadership seems to instigate, not the peaceful civil-rights 'please-be-nice-and-change-your-oppressive-racist-establishment-from-the-inside' kinda protest of the 1960s (from which grew the ideologically futile beanstalk that he himself climbed to grab his meaningless political loot), and not the practical-yet-ethical self-defence type of stand against aggressive authority (as famously proposed by hard-sane independent men of the street, such as mr malcolm x), but rather the violent hate-fuelled revolt of extremists infiltrated then fired-up by agents of the cia and led by the power-gluttonous wannabe-bourgeois government-bitches (and here i use the word 'bitch' in its non-sexist sense), who, frustrated and angry with 9-to-5 career-chosen-cocksucking at the feet of their class-confining-overlords, leave over-remunerated work at weekends to mouth-off in a vicious repartie of reprisal reflected from the mirror of their own immoral folly, inciting the impressionable road-ragged grudge of youth to leap over the revolutionary barricade of bad-emotion and chuck their un-lived lives at the mercy of the unmerciful line-up of state mercenaries (clocked-in colleagues of those same senior pseudo-sunday-agitators, who, afraid of losing the slutty-slot in the system where they prattle and pose, slip-quietly-into-reverse in search of some mythical lost wallet, packed with hard hypocrisy); the epitomy of this syndrome: obama the rebel with a remote...

...and what has his highness to say about the assault on humanity in haiti, and the deliberate deluge which cruelly drowned a coastline of communities in japan? pre-informed rumours circulated halfway 'round the globe in awful anticipation of these cynical crimes - so why the officially sanctioned silence and the mass-media cover-up of a massively misunderstood murder? was there a soupçon of cia involvement, perhaps? or has the president been kept in the dark? and then we must examine the curiously ambushed ambassador in libya, cited as 'a friend of the arabs' - it's inconceivable that the cia did not know their own hoodlums were staging a slickly organized slap-in-the-face-of-america, designed to damage the obama administration. who stood to gain from this act of terror? mr romney? or would hitman clinton maybe consider herself a stiletto shoe-in if the united states were subjected to a short sharp spell of romney ruin...? the main question is: if not the president, who is running the cia? mitt romney? mrs clinton? a foreign nation? no-one?

if mr obama is being undermined by a clandestine inner circle for which he does not have the racial or family 'status' to attain membership, surely he must speak out? if he is being compelled, through malevolent threats, to slaughter the sons and daughters of mother earth and to rape africa and asia of their integral geological riches, surely he should resign and leave office in order to confront his extortionists? if none of the above apply, he must be man enough to carry the can; isn't it strange that there were no accusations of electoral racism when obama was voted into the white house, yet now there is a real chance that he could be voted out, the accusations of racism are flying every-which-way?

as a final gesture of goodwill, we here at spark up! editorial high-command would like to offer president obama a piece of sincere and heartfelt free-advice - namely, that in the event of him being fortunate enough to fluke another four years in office, he should please try to avoid playing the rôle of hillary clintwick's magic broomstick...

...and if he is not duly fated to be re-elected, we can cheerfully console him with the fact that a vacancy could soon arise for the position of coach at norwich city football club.


15 comments:

no shit sherlock said...

romney was indeed living in paris in 1968, precisely at the time of the notorious student uprisings, and i am compelled therefore to concur that he undoubtedly became a prime agitator amongst fellow marxist-revolutionaries during the swinging sixties era; however, my deductive trail diverges from that of the learned blogger by a most subtle twist, because it is unavoidably apparent to me that a red-blooded republican like mitt romney would never have contemplated whipping up such violent anti-capitalist sentiment against the establishment unless acting under the strictest instructions of the cia.

here lies mitt - at-heart, an altogether more likeable and decent fellow than his inconsequentially eloquent vanquisher said...

romney would definitely have made a better job of economic-housekeeping than president obama, who (in terms of business experience) is nothing but a clueless-lefty career-committee-fixture - believing as he does in the creationist theory of money magically growing on trees and displaying as he doesn't the aptitude to balance the weekly tea-and-biscuit budget. although i don't for sure know whether any salt-lake citizens were harmed in the process, romney successfully brought in the 2002 winter olympics on budget - then whilst governor of massachussetts, he sensitively nurtured cross-party agreement to achieve innovative humanitarian health care reform benefiting millions of ordinary americans, before proceeding to eliminate a $1.5 billion state-budget deficit by dint of spending-cuts, increased fees, and the closure of corporate tax-loopholes for the stinky-rich; unfortunately, at some point during his governorship, hard-right elements substituted mitt with an evil hood-like thunderbirds puppet, and it was this romney, fatally manipulated by multi-nationals, religious extremists, racists and the israelis, which recently attempted to reach the white house against a tidal flow of hispanic voters who could never have ignored history to trust such a seemingly fanatical republican. the spark up! team heartily applaud mr mitt for abruptly bringing obama face-to-face with his own political-mortality, and for causing white house expenditure on toilet-tissue to treble - retire and enjoy, mate.

a bucketful of rotten states said...

13 november 2012 19:37

i'd generally agree with that...and i felt much the same about uncle john mccain back in 2008...as regards foreign policy, romney was a dangerously unguided (or maybe deliberately misguided) rocket...but don't forget that the united states is still up shit-creek...obama's essentially a crowd-controlling cunt...and he's gonna have to fucking resurrect the dead if he wants to ensure his enduring historic legacy...for the 57th time, america has elected a president on account of his skin-colour...why break the habit of a discriminative dynasty?

lady lar-di-dah of lordship road said...

his leadership seems to instigate, not the peaceful civil-rights 'please-be-nice-and-change-your-oppressive-racist-establishment-from-the-inside' kinda protest of the 1960s (from which grew the ideologically futile beanstalk that he himself climbed to grab his meaningless political loot), and not the practical-yet-ethical self-defence type of stand against aggressive authority (as famously proposed by hard-sane independent men of the street, such as mr malcolm x), but rather the violent hate-fuelled revolt of extremists infiltrated then fired-up by agents of the cia and led by the power-gluttonous wannabe-bourgeois government-bitches

yet another disgwaceful attempt by spark up! to cynically compartmentalize and ideologically isolate the movement of oppwessed people...

it's a pwima facie case of divide and wooool, i say, divide and woooool, ya

mad manky marxist said...

15 November 2012 23:29

well, sure ain't my doing dear...but for once i have to agree, lady lardi...though i find it a bit rich coming from you...utilizing the oppressed as a bench on which to sit at the high-table of truffle-snorting...meanwhile using your political weight to keep the oppressed safely down in 'their place'...deviously dividing the proletariat amongst themselves: working-class left against working-class right, working-class black against working-class white. what a wonderful fucking world you live off.

bob barleywhine said...

i dunno, i have to roll on the side of spark up, see - init always the rich politically plugged-inta the power-socket of the establissment wot want violent revolution coz they 'ave nurtured an 'eavy hatred for the exploiter wot they work for but can't survive without coz they doth covet the nobs' trappin's of status as much as the nobheads 'emselves, wantin' not to degrade the system unto dust but to preserve it intacto only for to grab the gaol-keys for their own nasty sadistical enz, yeah? so why can't these governmentally-addicted guys turn their backs on the devil's drumbeat of demoncrazy, find a honest little un-state-umbilicatered job 'an chill man?

gob dillon said...

15 November 2012 23:33

fuckin' right on bob. well said bob. have a drag on this 'an a draft of that bob 'an fuck off so i can stretch out on me sofa an catch beastenders on me flatter squarer tv bob - which comprises me only pleasure in life even tho' i recognize intellectually that every cunt in the bestial broadgrafting copulation is either a paedo, fraudsta, gangsta, pro-government terrorist, anti-government terrorist, illuminati-intern or some other permutation of pervertery bob. god fuck knowz why anyone has the bare-brass to work for them or pay the grubby little outfit's licence-fee...by the time it's been proper purged the whole fuckin' scum-bucket should be ripe 'n ready for tipping into the thames 'an never mentioned again in civil-fuckin' society...with a bitta fuckin' luck paxman and the no-insight team will be washed-up on a desert island 'an nibbled to death by undernourished natives starting at the toes...all whilst watching repeats of emmerdale from the 1980's on a pacific satellite channel...what a way to go?...well, we can only fuckin' well dream can't we...? just like we did before the glorious advent of crap public-sluice programming...no wonder they had to invent the fuckin' internet...so the unemployed masses could share their freakiest interactive fetishistic fantasies for free from the cold comfort of their own state-subsidized fuckin' shell-holes...jesus dontcha think tameter 'umpsom is puttin' on some poundz or is that actuwally theatrical paddin'?

bob barleywhine said...

15 november 2012 23:35

well as luck 'as it, mr gob, i got a friend in the biz, the show-biz you unnerstan'...'an she 'as been informed by the best of authoritease (umpsum's personal twat-moss topiarist) that the big secret behind ms mini michelin-woman's bubbly figure is the strictest compliance with a specialist diet...yeah, it's called the 'stanislavski method' or so i am lead unto the believing of...'an apparently entails that the bbc must remunerate tameter in pure chocolate-éclairs until such time as she 'as finished preparing for 'er next-up part which they say is none-uvva than the leadin'-lady role in a feature-lengfh biopic of legendary equal bites campaigner baroness dubble-dollop of dalston, yeah man - the proposed title is gonna be diane does devon 'an the movie is halleged to contain a surreal succession of horal encounters of the creamy kind, all shot in west-country tea-emporiums...yeah soundz a cool flick bro'...can't wait to view it man.

gob dillon said...

15 november 2012 23:38

fuck me that soundz absolutely fuckin' disgustin bob - ain't it amazing what people will put themselves thro' for the betterment of their fellow fuckin' man? but i rate that tameter in the part, tho'...you know, they say she's 'ad it real fuckin' hard makin' it to where she is today...for example see, on beastenders, it's a known fact that black actors 'n actrisses only get a tiny fraction of wot the white ones get, 'n that's if they're lucky...so simply to make ends meet poor little tameter 'ad to audition not jus' for one part, but for five or six separate ones unner various alternative aliasses, if you get me meaning...hoping against hope that by wearin' slightly different wigs 'n slappin' on fluctuatin' thicknesses of cosmetical make-up she would fool the fuckin' producers 'n secure several different parts, some of 'em male...or so the story goes...'an that's 'ow she mastered the art of the shifty quick-change 'an developed her remarkible professional versatility for multi-personality projection...'an that's the god's honest truth, as it 'appens...totally fuckin' amazin' bird see...yeah, apparently she had to shag her way thro' the entire fuckin' scriptwritin' team just to ensure that none of the characters actually met on set. christ, the poor cow should get a fuckin' medal for services to thespianism above and below the call of duty, in my honest fuckin' opinion...shit, the gal's a bleedin' troopa, not-to-mention a fuckin' roll model.

granny knitpicker said...

13 november 2012 19:37

i would just like to mention that that nice mr romney waived an annual salary of $135,000 whilst governor of massachusetts (note correct spelling) and in doing so displayed a mature attitude to wealth which would bring a breath of fresh air into the expense-fiddling, money-grasping culture of the herd that grazes the british political field.

loony-libber lou said...

15 november 2012 23:29

it's not often i agree with someone like you, mad marxist, but yes...isn't it astonishing how people who are normally ideologically poles apart always seem to opine unanimously when the subject of debate turns to lady lardidah?

the political right and left are equally guilty of exploiting those who vote their parties into power - the right 'protect' the general population from the hard reality of making money through business deals by granting them the security of a rock-bottom but rock-steady regular wage, whilst the left create an alternative reality where no-one has to worry about a thing because the state is all-knowing and all-caring, and meantime both sets of rogues reap the rich rewards of stewardship, leaving the non-affiliated public in highly-policed penury.

fucking marvellous.

it is also worth noting that the right will kill you if you do not do as they tell you (ie. hand over commodities, mineral assets etc at the dictated paltry price), and the left will kill you if you do not think as they tell you.

just a thought.

terminally disorientated anarchist said...

so nice to see everyone here resonating in harmonious agreement...except for the rebellious lady lardi, of course...

yep, loony-libber...since a young adult it's been made double clear to me that, as a consequence of their various institutional prejudices, i was not welcome in either camp, left or right...

...and as for revolutionaries, let me say this: whatever their denomination, creed or community derivation, they are all ultimately fighting for the god-given right to be equally evil as their established oppressors - revolution ain't never about simple self-defence, it always harbours a revengeful greed for power. screw 'em all.

nowt good ever comes of forced payment said...

15 november 2012 23:35

the british brainwashing corporation cultivates the skills and technology to carry out highly intimate surveillance operations...

...and this is fine and dandy when used for uncovering the dirty-dealings of rogue tradesmen, professionals and politicians...or for staging those hilarious hidden-camera pranks (which are, in the final analysis, the only productions of value that justify the cost of the television licence-fee to the baying schadenfreude of the sadistic british public)...

...but obviously, unlimited access to such a highly-sophisticated eavesdropping, spying and monitoring capability forms in the mainpart a far greater attraction to the closet cult-rings of paedophiles, fraudsters, gangsters, terrorists, and perverts whose members treat these types of equipment as tools of the trade for extortion and control.

is this the (free) licence we wish to give our public servants?

the anti-president said...

the celebs will always apologize for obama and american war-crimes - they can't help it, the poor dears, they're as-thick-as-fuck.

bless 'em, i've heard it all:

'the guy was tricked by george bush into sending more and more troops to trash afghanistan'

'he was new to the job'

etc etc...

well, was mr go-get-'em forced against his will into taking the presidency? no, he was fully signed-up to the war on muslim families (and islamic independence) from the beginning.

long after obama-critics such as myself are buried six-feet-under in deep-dished democratic dirt, these present-day presidential bum-kissing performers will be bouncing their grand-kiddies on their knees...and desperately attempting to avoid any 'n all mention of their own former association with the man whom history will rapidly deem to have done nuffin' for no-one (and a whole loada harm to millions).

in retirement, these precious performers will rue their admiration of the president's special glam-guard, the cia, whose cruel capitalizing operatives will be regarded, through the eyes of future generations, more as nazi ss, or north atlantic slave-traders - in due recognition of their expletive exploits in africa.

these pull-string performers are committed purely to progressing their personal political power, to controlling their charade of a community instead of liberating it, to concealing rather than revealing reality, and consequently can never achieve true maturity as artistes.

in less than the span of an average western half-life, barack obama's name will be no more than an equally-spaced entry on a dusty old list of overpaid overrated executives, unremarkable save for their capacity for conducting unrequited evil.

politics and art do not mix. amen.

the ass-for-titbits affair said...

16 november 2012 00:13

the prejudices ingrained into the sick souls of the political left and right prevent them from doing what normal people do - namely, reading the papers, browsing the internet and watching the telly in an objective a manner as is possible, such that, through all the manifold balderdash, they might engage their experience to gain a glimpse of that intransferable commodity, the truth; conversely, those bent on political power are not interested in the truth, but prefer to rely on what they term 'intelligence', a highly-priced commodity with which they seek to control and ruin the lives of others - this 'intelligence' is 'bought' from more senior links in their respective extended socio-political support networks and is therefore, by the nature of its provenance, already censored and spun to such a degree as to ensure that the recipient himself also remains suitably controlled by the group-elders, brainwashed by the group-ideology, and evermore terminally addicted to the group-gossip.