Friday 24 January 2020

clipped words: dig in heels for democracy - or dig a dyke against humanity?



ignorantly deleted by neo-colonial euro-centric cunts in february 2019 - but now finally re-presented for your eternal eclectic edification - here-below is another of my comments upon the hackney citizen article entitled ‘corbyn before country’: council slammed for people’s vote ‘fudge’ as it prepares to ‘firmly reject’ no-deal brexit:

"president trump is right:
taking the 'no-deal'-brexit-option 'off the table' will undermine our negotiating position with the eu - and is tantamount to raising the white flag, then allowing the uk to be forced into remaining within the european union.
if there is the political will to execute it, a 'no-deal'-exit from the european union should be perfectly manageable by the civil service - after all, it's for mind-bendingly labyrinthine jobs like this that we employ civil servants for chrissakes.
a 'no-deal'-brexit will force the european union and the uk government to negotiate like grown-ups, and thus expedite the agreement of a trade-deal which would otherwise be dominated and dragged out by the eu for many years - probably leaving us pretty much trapped in the protectionist eu-trade-bloc forever. 
it is simple scare-mongering to state that a 'no-deal'-exit from the eu will lead to disaster, and any such assertion clearly forms part of the cia's 'project-fear' - 'no-brexit' on the other hand will definitely represent the death of british democracy, and be very, very dangerous - both politically and constitutionally...
and i am not joking about this.
jeremy corbyn desperately wants to remove the 'no-deal'-brexit-option, because he knows that, should theresa may successfully deliver genuine 'brexit' via the 'no-deal'-route, she will then be credited for standing up to an intransigent european union, and considered to be standing up for british democracy. the inevitable effect of theresa may successfully executing a 'no-deal'-exit from the eu will be to attract millions of conservative votes at the next general election - and to consign to the dirty great dustbin of history any real short-term chance of the labour party returning to government.
for mrs may, a 'no-deal'-stand-off, in the name of democracy, is a matter of political principle well worth upholding, whilst ironically, for mr trump - who correctly advized mrs may to pursue the 'no-deal'-brexit-option - his own 'no-deal'-stand-off for the sake of funding a divisive mexican border-wall is, in strictly ethical terms at least, valueless, since, in common with the introduction of any form of immigration-control, the construction of such a politically motivated barrier can only cause misery for millions, restrict freedom, and diminish human-rights."

No comments: