hardnut hague backs israel against palestine and supports syria against syria

i don't know who's paying our thigh-slapping finger-flapping foreign secretary to stick his well-powdered nose into these two middle-eastern conflicts, but it surely can't be the british public?  with due respect to the deranged details of these bitter historical disputes, both sides in the syrian civil-war and both in the gazan conflict are gripped in a desperate deathlock and have every intention of rolling over the precipice, taking each other's communities, and any assistant combatants, to a permanent and peaceful settlement on the smooth marble foot-stones of the chasm of no-return.

just because the united kingdom is (supposed to be) pulling out of the war in afghanistan, it does not mean that our government should be finding another arena in which our military can spread indiscriminate carnage - in fact, quite the opposite i would have thought.  the involvement of our armed forces in syria and blatantly biased heavy-handed ministerial interference in gaza can only lead to fatal fall-out with iran and russia - eventually guaranteeing an industrial dose of terror and destruction on the streets of britain's towns and cities, that we might better appreciate the plight of those already under the congressional cosh of the massed cashed cohorts.

hopelessly hamstrung by his own hypocrisy, hague claims: "hamas bears principal responsibility for the current crisis".  well hear this wee willy wonkywall: 'the current crisis' is over half-a-century old and this country's great leaders have contributed to it copiously from its very creation.

no-fly zone over syria?  fuck me hague*, have you ever considered a no-fly zone over gaza, or considered arming the palestinians?  has it ever even crossed your sold-out sense-proof mind to condemn the israelis for their perpetual splitter-splatter of previous war-crimes?  has it ever occurred to you to call the syrian opposition to book for their disregard of human rights?  if the answer to all these questions is a resounding "no", then i suggest you back out sharpish from the whole bloody debate and take your battered boy soldiers with you.

it's more than spark up's life is worth even to contemplate condoning the killing of civilians - whether this be by israelis, palestinians, or either faction in the syrian slaughter - but he-man hague is all for slyly passing the blame for the obliteration of palestinian children onto (guess who?) the palestinians.

from the days of the oxford bullingdon club and the salacious violence-fuelled news-stories of its members' 'bashes' with black call-girls at the rothschilds' extravagant waddesdon manor, one has always taken it as read that cameron, johnson, osbourne and company were the overpaid overdressed overrated and overfed footmen of the israeli government...

...but hague's from an altogether different set, yet dances delicately and deftly to the tel-aviv tune like a real rehearsed pro - so the whiff of a question left wafting in the wasting wind is this: what diffractive goodies do his poppet-masters have on him?

*preferably not